Looking Behind the Numbers in
Florida and Ohio
Yesterday we examined a Virginia poll of likely voters from Virginia
that was recently conducted jointly by the New York Times, Quinnipiac, and CBS
News. We noted that President Obama’s
lead in that poll was predicated on an electorate that was even more heavily
Democratic than indicated by 2008 exit polls.
In fact, if you recalculate top line results for that poll based off of
the internal partisan indicators then Mitt Romney would be leading in Virginia
unless the electorate is almost as Democratic as it was in 2008.
Today, we’ll do an abbreviated version of that exercise for the new
NYT/CBS/Q polls released for Florida, and Ohio. WE ARE NOT ARGUING THAT THE PARTISAN
MAKEUP OF LIKELY VOTERS IS DEFINITELY INCORRECT, BUT SUGGESTING THAT THEY RAISE
INTERESTING QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW THE LIKELY VOTER MODEL IS CONSTRUCTED AND WHAT
QUESTIONS THAT APPROACH RAISES.
Our view is that at the present time polling suggests that under a
scenario where the electorate looks like 2008, President Obama would win if the
election were held today. If the
electorate looks like 2004, then a Romney win is probable.
FLORIDA NYT/CBS/Q Poll Obama 53
Romney 44
The following table pretty much says it all. In this poll Democrats hold a 9 percentage point edge in the pool of likely voters. This compares to a Democratic advantage of 3 percentage points in 2008 AND a Republican advantage of 4 percentage points in 2004.
Another way to look at this is the ratio of Democratic voters to
Republican voters. The poll suggests
that there will be 1.33 Democratic voters for every Republican voter. In 2008, the ratio was 1.09. In 2004, it was 0.9.
Now this does not mean that President Obama is losing Florida. It does suggest that a nine point advantage
for Obama is highly unlikely here is what the race looks like at various
partisan makeups. The bottom line is
that if Likely Voters were weighted to look more like 2004 than 2008, Romney
would be leading in the poll.
A couple of other items jump out when looking at this poll’s
internals. While you have to be careful
when looking at population subgroups based upon the sample size, here are a couple
of interesting numbers that might seem inconsistent with the poll’s top line
numbers.
·
Romney leads among Independents by a margin of
49%-46%.
·
Obama leads among Hispanics 55% - 41%.
·
Paul Ryan is viewed more favorably (38%-32%) by
Independents than Joe Biden (37%-47%).
·
By a margin of 56% - 39%, Independent disapprove
of President Obama’s job performance.
OHIO NYT/CBS/Q Poll Obama 53
Romney 43
Similar to Florida, the composition of the electorate is critical to
how you construct the pool of likely voters is critical. In Ohio, a 2004 type electorate would move
this in Romney’s direction.
This likely voter poll is slightly more Democratic than the 2008
electorate -- +9D vs. +8D. The 2004
electorate was +5R. The ratio of
Democrats to Republicans in the poll was 1.35 to 1 vs. 1.26 in 2008 and 0.88 in
2004. Small difference, but still more
Democratic than 2008 voters.
Here are a couple of other interesting tidbits in the polls crosstabs.
·
Romney leads 47%-46% among Independents in this
poll.
·
Obama leads by 60%-35% among women, Romney by
52-44% among men.
·
Among white voters Romney leads 49%-46%; 57%-40%
with white men, and trails 53%-42% among white women.
Of course, party identification is not the only issue that
can influence a poll’s outcome. Other
demographic factors such as gender, race, age and marital status can have a
significant impact. This is not to say
the data behind the polls is wrong, but to remind readers that the
interpretation of the data is also a major factor.
We won't know who is right until Election Day, but there is no question that the NYT/CBS/Q polls have a more generous view of this year's electorate for the President than even the 2008 turnout would justify.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep it clean; on topic; show respect for others. Comments are moderated.